Content

Impervious Soil Coverage (Sealing of Soil Surface) 2011

Figures / Tables

Figures

Fig. 1: Temperature Curves Over Various Surfaces

GIF-Document (19.7 kB) Image: Kessler 1971 in: Mählenhoff 1989

Fig. 2: Diagram of the Hybrid Mapping Procedure

GIF-Document (30.4 kB)

Fig. 3: Diagram of the Spectral Classification of Non-Built-Up Sections

GIF-Document (52.4 kB)

Fig. 4: Diagram of Rule-based Classification

GIF-Document (62.1 kB)

Fig. 5: Diagram of the 2011 Rule-based Classification

GIF-Document (43.2 kB)

Fig. 6: Uncorrected Degree of Impervious Coverage (Grid Data) – Intermediate Results of Rule-based Classification

PNG-Document (561.8 kB)

Fig. 7: Degree of Impervious Coverage by Borough (in Percentage of Total Area without Bodies of Water)

GIF-Document (14.4 kB)

Fig. 7: Degree of Impervious Coverage by Borough (in Percentage of Total Area without Bodies of Water)

XLS-Document (40.0 kB)

Fig. 8: Map of Changes in Impervious Coverage between 2005 in 2011

PNG-Document (287.0 kB)

Fig. 9: Degrees of impervious coverage shown in the Environmental Atlas, 2005 in 2011 Editions, compared with the annually generated data of the EEAL.

GIF-Document (23.1 kB)

Fig. 9: Degrees of impervious coverage shown in the Environmental Atlas, 2005 in 2011 Editions, compared with the annually generated data of the EEAL.

XLS-Document (19.0 kB)

Tables

Tab. 1: Overview of impervious pavement classes

XLS-Document (14.0 kB)

Tab. 2: Assignment Variants: Degree of Vegetation – Degree of Impervious Coverage

GIF-Document (9.9 kB)

Tab. 3: Correction Factor by Section Type

XLS-Document (16.5 kB)

Tab. 4: Impervious Coverage Classes in Non-built-up Impervious Areas

XLS-Document (32.0 kB)

Tab. 5: Mean Degrees of Impervious Coverage per Section Type, 2011

XLS-Document (41.0 kB)

Tab. 6: Mean Degrees of Impervious Coverage by Land-use Type

XLS-Document (32.5 kB)

Tab. 7: Results of mapping of impervious coverage in Berlin, 1990 to 2011. (all information refers to the total area of Berlin, incl. streets and bodies of water). Due to changed evaluation methods, no change can be concluded for the entire period of time. The values for 1990 and 2001 are based on different evaluation methods, which do not permit any comparison with the values for 2005 and 2011. However, a comparison between 2005 in 2011 is possible.

GIF-Document (12.0 kB)