Content

Impervious Soil Coverage (Sealing of Soil Surface) 2011

Figures / Tables

Figures

Fig. 1: Temperature Curves Over Various Surfaces

GIF-Document Image: Kessler 1971 in: Mählenhoff 1989

Fig. 2: Diagram of the Hybrid Mapping Procedure

GIF-Document

Fig. 3: Diagram of the Spectral Classification of Non-Built-Up Sections

GIF-Document

Fig. 4: Diagram of Rule-based Classification

GIF-Document

Fig. 5: Diagram of the 2011 Rule-based Classification

GIF-Document

Fig. 6: Uncorrected Degree of Impervious Coverage (Grid Data) – Intermediate Results of Rule-based Classification

PNG-Document

Fig. 7: Degree of Impervious Coverage by Borough (in Percentage of Total Area without Bodies of Water)

GIF-Document

Fig. 7: Degree of Impervious Coverage by Borough (in Percentage of Total Area without Bodies of Water)

XLS-Document

Fig. 8: Map of Changes in Impervious Coverage between 2005 in 2011

PNG-Document (287.0 kB)

Fig. 9: Degrees of impervious coverage shown in the Environmental Atlas, 2005 in 2011 Editions, compared with the annually generated data of the EEAL.

GIF-Document

Fig. 9: Degrees of impervious coverage shown in the Environmental Atlas, 2005 in 2011 Editions, compared with the annually generated data of the EEAL.

XLS-Document

Tables

Tab. 1: Overview of impervious pavement classes

XLS-Document (14.0 kB)

Tab. 2: Assignment Variants: Degree of Vegetation – Degree of Impervious Coverage

GIF-Document (9.9 kB)

Tab. 3: Correction Factor by Section Type

XLS-Document (16.5 kB)

Tab. 4: Impervious Coverage Classes in Non-built-up Impervious Areas

XLS-Document (32.0 kB)

Tab. 5: Mean Degrees of Impervious Coverage per Section Type, 2011

XLS-Document (41.0 kB)

Tab. 6: Mean Degrees of Impervious Coverage by Land-use Type

XLS-Document (32.5 kB)

Tab. 7: Results of mapping of impervious coverage in Berlin, 1990 to 2011. (all information refers to the total area of Berlin, incl. streets and bodies of water). Due to changed evaluation methods, no change can be concluded for the entire period of time. The values for 1990 and 2001 are based on different evaluation methods, which do not permit any comparison with the values for 2005 and 2011. However, a comparison between 2005 in 2011 is possible.

GIF-Document (12.0 kB)